Comma
may be abolished from English language'
LONDON: Death of the comma? One of the most
commonly used elements of written English - the humble comma - could be
abolished as a punctuation mark without doing much damage to the language, a US
academic has suggested.
Professor John McWhorter, an associate professor of English and
comparative literature at Columbia University, believes that removing commas from
most modern US texts would cause little loss of clarity.
McWhorter said that as Internet users and even
some writers become increasingly idiosyncratic - if not indifferent - in their
use of the punctuation mark, it may have outstayed its welcome, 'The Times'
reported.
You "could take them out of a
great deal of modern American texts and you would probably suffer so little
loss of clarity that there could even be a case made for not using commas at
all," McWhorter said.
He cited the Oxford comma,
inserted after the penultimate item in a list, as an example of the mark's
obsolescence.
"Nobody has any reason for it
that is scientifically sensible and logical in the sense that we know how
hydrogen and oxygen combine to form water," McWhorter told Slate magazine.
"So these things are just
fashions and conventions. They change over time," he said.
PTI story published in newspapers on February
10, 2014
--
Comma RIP: Is this ubiquitous punctuation mark heading to a
full stop?
Columbia University professor
John McWhorter suggests the comma is way past its expiry date. This is not just
because we've learnt to save time and use words — or 'wrds' — composed of
collapsible letters today. McWhorter says the comma need never have been a pillar
on our grammatical landscape for there's no inherent logic to the little chap.
You could apparently withdraw the comma from most modern American texts and not
even notice the difference.
The stinging dismissal will certainly cause many writers to pause
mid-phrase. We anticipatePico Iyer —
who's earlier written a blushing essay in fulsome praise of the comma where he
likens the punctuation mark to how we bat our eyelashes and murmur endearments
to lovers — will express disapproval replete with red-faced full stops. But
Pico's party of punctuation-lovers will face stiff challenge from Gertrude
Stein who condemns the comma stringently. Stein writes the comma is basically
"a poor period that stops and lets you take a breath". She tartly
elaborates — "But if you want to take a breath you ought to know yourself
that you want to take a breath." That's not all. Stein remarks a comma
enfeebles. It distracts. It annoyingly dilutes what must be intense.
Clearly the comma war won't pause just yet. But
it will tickle grammar's grandmasters by presenting new games. Oscar Wilde delighted many by confessing he'd spent most of the day putting in a
comma and the rest taking it out. From there to writing editorials sans a comma
at all is just another fun move on changing chessboards of words where clauses
and pauses keep shifting but the challenge — to communicate — stays the same.
(Times of India, Edit, Feb 11, 2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment